The political spin that politicians and news media are putting on the so-called immigrant “caravan” surging against our Southern border is placing our nation and our people at great risk. Those who downplay the danger are either naive, misinformed, or totally unconcerned with the future of our nation. These are not “harmless” refugee seeking asylum – this is an invasion by foreign, hostile forces.
Our progressive and sophisticated brethren downplay the danger that this “caravan” represents. After all, they say, it's a few thousand people “just” looking for a better life. We have enough in this country to go around. I do not disparage the expression of generosity, but I do question the intelligence and quality of thought behind it. It may be true that our nation's welfare system could accept 7 to 10 thousand people. The question becomes, how much strain would it put on the budgets and resources of various states and localities. How well prepared to take in 1,000 homeless, jobless, people is your town or county? How many people with undiagnosed contagions can your local hospital take in? What potential for violence does a group of several hundred or several thousand “refugee” present to local law enforcement?
If you have taken time to dig into the news from Mexico, you know that this “caravan” has been violent and destructive on its trek north. The people in the group have attacked local police, they have looted villages in their path, they have burned American flags, and cursed America and our President. Many of these people, unless I am totally wrong, are coming to America to loot and pillage. They are, in my opinion, coming to try to get whatever material wealth they can – by whatever means necessary. I don't think they are coming in order to become productive citizens.
Nor is this the first time that masses of people have surged against our Southern border. Several times over the past few years, crowds of teenagers from Mexico and Central American have come to Texas and been given entry. The success of these earlier invasions has given this group of people reason to think that the US government will cave and let them flood across – only to be followed by thousands more. The refusal to protect our Southern border by previous presidents has given a green light to others who want to come to take whatever they can.
Should this invasion be allowed, our nation will not long endure.
Before you “sophisticates” pass this off as the rantings of a “right-wing fanatic racist bigot homophone”, let us consider several things. The first thing to consider is the idea of “asymmetric” warfare.” Asymmetric warfare is a “war” between belligerents who have vastly different firepower and vastly differing tactics and strategies. Consider the Vietnam war. Consider the Russian invasion of Afghanistan. Consider the current war that the radical Muslims are waging against the Western world. While there was a North Vietnamese government behind the guerrillas, they used vastly different tactics. The Afghani fighters and the Muslim terrorists are not a country's army, but they are nonetheless, conducting warfare against nation states. These are examples of “asymmetric” warfare.
Sending thousands of “unarmed” people into another country is also a form of “asymmetric warfare. The weapons are human bodies, the strategy is to overwhelm the United States and cause our government to collapse.
You must also understand that in Mexico and Central America, people are taught that the Western US is legitimately a part of Mexico. Many people in those countries do not accept that the current boundaries are legal. And there are many “sophisticates” and progressives in the US who also believe that the United States is not a legitimate nation. And it follows, therefore, that if the nation is not legitimate the wealth of its people also belongs to Mexico and the Central American people. There is, a driving force behind this invasion.
In order to fully understand the danger of this invasion, one must also understand the Cloward – Piven Strategy. In the 1960's, sociologists and political activists, Cloward and Pliven postulated that the only way to eliminate poverty in the US was to completely overwhelm the social welfare system and force the government to adopt a total income distribution system. Radicalized, the strategy has been expanded to suggest that by overwhelming a government's financial foundation by massive spending, a nation can be destroyed from within. After years of massive deficit spending, the US is now faced with a massively expensive humanitarian crisis in this invasion and those that surely will follow. In not too many years, the financial system of the US will no longer be able to sustain the spending and the government will collapse. It is from the ruins of the United States this now is, will come the United States of the future; a just, fair, socialist world partner will arise. Do not misunderstand the gravity. There is strategy and planning behind the apparent chaos south of our border.
There is also money behind the “caravans” flowing north through Mexico. Consider for a moment, how much food, how much water, and how many restrooms there would have to be for a group of 5,000 people. When we see these people on the TV news, we see clothed and fed people. We see tents, we see blankets, we see pants and shoes. We do not see a massive mob of destitute people. Were this really an organic, self-motivated, self-directed migration, we would be seeing destitute, desperate people. If this were truly a migration of “refugees” they would be pillaging and destroying everything in their path. Starving migrants on the move are desperate. And we are not seeing the images that we have seen of people trying to escape war, genocide, and starvation.
Somebody, or somebodies, have invested vast amounts of money into feeding and supplying this mass of humanity. Somebody organized it. Somebody put it all together. There is a great deal of planning and logistics involved. Somebody has planned, organized, purchased equipment and supplies. Somebody has laid out the routes, alerted the news media and made this thing happen. We do know that several UN agencies are assisting the”caravan” and we can only wonder how much anti-American Iranian, Arabian and other foreign government money is involved. And we cannot forget that billionaire George Soros hates the US and has the resources to feed, cloth and house an army of 5,000 or more “refugees”. Soros has repeatedly said that his goal is to destroy the United States.
Do not mistake this invasion for a humanitarian crisis. This is planned, organized, directed and funded by people, maybe nations, that want to destroy the US. The philosophy is there, the theory is there, the funding is there. We are being attacked and, like the long-ago Romans, we will be defeated if we do not stop this invasion. The stakes have never been higher. How strong is our resolve?
Saturday, November 24, 2018
Monday, February 27, 2017
Not Racism - Self Preservation
Certain academics and some globalization proponents are making the argument that people have, as a Right of Humanity, the right to free movement and migration. While most Americans who advocate open borders are not familiar with this concept; they are being used as “useful idiots” by the free migration crowd whose fundamental purpose is the creation of a world government.
The Right of Migration is predicated upon the idea that humanity, as the height of existence, has a basic human right to travel, live and work where ever they choose. A Utopian ideal at best, this doctrine does not acknowledge the sovereignty of nation states as an instrument of social stability. Or, simply put, the right to migration cannot, by its definition, allow nation states to provide the safety and stability necessary for orderly human existence. There is no universally shared culture – and no way to ensure that cultures and societies as developed by people, can continue in the face of unrestricted migration.
Whether we want to admit it or not, the world is ruled by the aggressive use of force. Nations that are willing to use aggressive force attack their neighbors just as schoolyard bullies pick on other kids. Cultures that are willing to be aggressive overwhelm their neighboring cultures. This is the way of the world – always has been and always will be. It is this reality that likely led to the formation of the first government type of organizations in the earliest days of human society. Even hunter – gatherer bands would have likely combined resources to defend their territory from others migrating into that territory to protect the food supply of the band. Self preservation, with the goal of survival of the species, is probably the most fundamental instincts in all animals.
As humanity transitioned from nomadic hunter – gatherer to agrarian economies, the need for protection and stability became more important. Hunter – gatherers could go to new areas to search for food. Agrarians need to stay until their crops are ready to harvest and store against the winter. And once that food was stored, the agrarians would want to stay near their food. Migrating peoples could decimate an agrarian community by eating all of a winter’s worth of food in a few days or weeks. Unrestricted migration became an existential threat to established societies as human economy became more settled and more specialized and in response, people began to band together for mutual defense and protection. Hence, the origins of governments.
Although nations in the developed world, and large portions of nations in the Third World have progressed well beyond basic agrarian economies, the threat to economic (food, clothing and shelter) stability becomes, maybe more, serious as economies become more advanced and more specialized (consumers being farther removed from the origins of production.) At any point in time a nation has only a limited amount of resources. There is only so much food, so many houses, so many coats available in a nation at any given time. Unrestricted migration can create shortages in all of these resources. Unrestricted migration threatens modern economic stability just as seriously as it threatened simple agrarian societies and hunter – gatherer bands.
Two of the basic purposes of all governments are to provide security from invading armies and to create and maintain social order and stability. (Essentially, defense army and police forces.) The social contract between the governed and the governors is sacrosanct. That social contract may be vastly different between nations, but each nation has some form of that contract. Some are written some are not; but all are real and all must be fulfilled. When any government ceases to protect its subjects or citizens from invading armies or allows economic and social chaos, that government loses its legitimacy and will be replaced through revolution. There can be no social or economic stability with unrestricted migration.
Let us consider for a moment just two of the differences between contemporary American society and “Hispanic” and Moslem cultures. In Mexico and many Central American countries dog fighting and cock fighting are acceptable past times. In many Moslem countries, polygamy and pedophilia (girls as young as 8 being forced into marriages with older men) are culturally acceptable. Are these behaviors that we want in our country? Are these behaviors that we want our children and grandchildren exposed to? Besides the threat to economic stability, unrestricted migration threatens existing social conventions. These are real issues that need to be addressed.
The rate of legal immigration must be predicated upon the need for additional workers in the economy and the rate of assimilation. Between waves of legal immigration, there has to be time for those new immigrants to assimilate into the host country’s culture. It may take 2 generations for that assimilation to take place. There was virtually no immigration into the United States from the early 1920s until the mid 11960s, following the great flood of legal immigration during the last half of the 19th century. By the 1960s, all of those previous immigrants and their children and grandchildren had become Americans – culturally as well as legally. Unrestricted, uncontrolled immigration offers no protection for existing culture.
The more liberal (for want of a better word) among us who favor open borders seem to think that Americans can provide a good living for anyone in the world who can make it here. I see it differently. Charity should begin at home. As I write this, there are about 93 MILLION Americans without jobs. Fully 1/3 of Americans over the age of 16 are out of work. The social contract between Americans and the Federal Government requires that every American citizen who is willing to work has a job. That portion of the contract cannot be fulfilled with unrestricted migration.
This is the real unemployment number – 32.7% unemployed.
The mainstream news media and the morons in government crow about the economy creating 150,000 jobs in a month. At that rate, it would take 626 months to put all of these people back to work. Six hundred twenty-six months is 52 years. Our economy, our nation our treasuries, public and private, cannot continue to carry 93 million unemployed Americans and millions of illegal migrants. There is always a straw that breaks the camels back.
We have thousands of wounded warriors and other veterans who are homeless, jobless, living on the streets unable to get the medical care that they need. Our government, our society must care for these before we worry about people in the far-flung corners of the Earth. There is something wrong with bringing people into this country to work when we have more than 30% unemployment. There is something almost obscene about feeding, clothing and housing people who break the laws of our country to come here, while our heroes and wounded warriors do without fundamental life necessities. We should take care of our own, before we open our borders to a flood of non-citizens.
It is not racist, nor xenophobic, nor Islamophobic to believe that our Government should control the borders and control who comes into this country. Quite the contrary it is only common sense to believe that our preservation as a society and as an economy should be protected by our Government. Immigrants who migrate legally are expected to assimilate and become part of the ever-evolving American culture. We are a nation of immigrants, but we must protect our citizens before we allow more migrants into our nation. It is not racist – it is a matter of self-preservation.
Friday, December 16, 2016
Why Some of Us Are Skeptics
A December morning with an 8 below windchill in Western Pennsylvania seems to be a good time to write about Anthropogenic Climate Change. On this subject, I consider myself to be a “skeptic”, while many of the more rabid “believers” would call me a “denier”. The difference between being a skeptic and a denier rests upon whether or not one chooses to “believe” that human activity is driving climate change.
That I am forced to use the word “believe” speaks volumes about the issue. I do not “believe” that the sun comes up in the East. I know that it does. I do not “believe” in gravity. I know that it exists. I do not have to “believe” that 1 + 1 = 2. I know that it does. Truth and fact do not require a statement of faith. Unproven, unprovable speculations do. There is no proof that ghosts exist, yet many of us “believe” that they do. One might say that there is no “proof” that God exists, yet many of us “believe” that He does.
There is a certain sweet irony in that one of the best definitions of the word “faith” comes from the Bible. In his letter to the Hebrews, the Apostle Paul wrote, “Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.” Belief and faith are defined the same. If we are asked to “believe” in man made climate change, that in itself, is a statement of its unproven, unprovable nature.
Many of the climate alarmists (those who are convinced that man is messing up our planet) claim that the “science is settled” and that there is no further need to study the causes of climate change, but rather that we need to act and act radically now in order to “save the planet”. These alarmists are partly right, there is some settled science about climate and how it changes. One fact of climate science is that there have been many, perhaps as many as 9, different periods of glaciation in the past million years of world history. Geologists and climate scientists can demonstrate without doubt that this is true. Astronomers have shown that the Earth moves in an elliptical orbit about the sun and that the angle with which sunlight strikes the Earth also changes as the Earth moves in this egg shaped orbit. These changes in the Earth’s orbit and angel are the Milankovic Cycles and follow very closely the ice ages of the past million years. Scientists also know that the energy output of our Sun is cyclical and changes in orderly, predictable cycles. That is to say, that the sun sends more “heat” to the Earth at certain times and less at others. The heat output of the sun correlates to the number of sunspots and the record of sunspots matches known periods of warmth and cold on the Earth. This is the “settled” science of climate change. Everything else is pure speculation.
The discussion of whether or not human produced CO2 can impact the climate is somewhat silly at best and incredibly stupid at its worst. CO2 is one of the most important gases in our atmosphere and is one of the basic components of almost all plant and animal life. Green plants use CO2 for growth and produce oxygen from the CO2. Carbon dioxide is an essential part of life, it is not in any way a pollutant. Increases in CO2 in the atmosphere increases plant growth which in turn uses more CO2/. Like all other natural cycles, the CO2 cycle is almost perfect in its simplicity.
Climate alarmists contend (with no proof) that increasing CO2 levels increase the temperature of the atmosphere. Ice cores and tree rings suggest that CO2 levels respond to increases in atmospheric temperate, not cause them. The study of these ice cores and tree rings suggest that changes in the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere may lag temperate changes by as many as 800 years. It is unknowable and unprovable.
How much carbon dioxide is really in the Earth’s atmosphere? Picture a football field in your mind. Focus of the goal line. Now, imagine a postage stamp on the goal line. That, a postage stamp on a football field, represents the amount of CO2 in our atmosphere. How much of an effect can that tiny postage stamp have on the entirety of the football field. Let common sense take over here.
The alarmists claim that man made CO2 is “different” from naturally occurring CO2. Again, let common sense have sway here. Is there any logical reason why combining carbon and oxygen in a coal fired factory can be any different from combining carbon and oxygen in a volcano, or a forest fire or – a coal mine fire? Does it make any sense that atmospheric heat would react differently to one molecule of CO2 because of its origin? It just doesn’t make sense.
The atmosphere of the Earth opens onto outer space. The temperate of outer space is nearly absolute zero or 459 degrees below zero. Heat rises. No matter how hot the Earth’s atmosphere becomes, the heat will be drained off into space. This is sort of how your travel mug of coffee will get cold really quickly in the car this morning.
It is all well and good to be concerned about good stewardship of our world’s resources. It is ridiculous to make far reaching government rules and regulations based on speculation and not on facts. Alarmists are willing to deprive developing nations cheap energy from fossil fuels in their quest to “save the planet”. These same alarmists are willing to cede national sovereignty to unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats at the UN in the name of climate change.
About 12,000 years ago, the Earth began to warm and the last period of glaciation began to end. Our human ancestors adapted to the changing climate. Are we less able to adapt than they were. About 100,000 years ago, the climate of Earth began to cool and glaciers developed and moved across much o the Northern Hemisphere. Our pre-human ancestors did what our human ancestors did 90,000 years later – they adapted. And they did it without governments, without Progressives and without a ruling class. I have to believe, I have to have faith “the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen” that modern man will react, adapt and thrive regardless of what the climate does.
Enjoy this first hard cold snap. It’s not even winter yet!
Monday, November 7, 2016
Think Before You Vote
It is not alarmist
to say that the fate of our nation depends on the outcome of
tomorrow’s Presidential election. Should the American people, or a
rigged election system, put Hillary Clinton in the White House,
America as we have known it, America as it was Founded will cease to
exist.
Our nation has
suffered through 8 years of horrific, lawless rule by the ruling
elites led by President Obama. We have seen our Federal Government
ignore laws that it did not like, use the force of the IRS against
people and groups opposed to the Government, and force us to buy
health insurance that we cannot afford and hat does not pay for
services. We have watched as Moslem terrorists have come to the US
and wrecked their havoc across out nation. Under the current
leadership, America has surrendered it’s role as world leader and
we are seeing violence and Moslem extremist set the world aflame.
Here at home, we
have become one of the most taxed and regulated people in the world.
Our so-called leaders have turned us against one another – there is
more racial unrest today than at any time since the early 1970s. Our
cities have become war zones where police are accused of randomly
murdering black men and police are the targets of ambushes and sniper
attacks.
Our cultural
heritage is under siege. Television and movies are awash with filth
and degredation and all manners of perversion. Christians and
Christian beliefs are routinely attacked in schools, universities and
in the press. The freedom of worship protection is the Constitution
has been warped, twisted and raped into being a “freedom from
religion” right – banning free Christian expression in public.
Behaviors that Christians believe to be sins are celebrated in pop
culture; and Christians are demonized when they object.
People supporting
Donald Trump have been attacked by Clinton supporters. Republican
campaign buildings have been vandalized and burned. There does not
seem to be any respect or empathy for those with whom we disagree.
Neither Donald Trump
nor Hillary Clinton are people who I would want to sit and share a
meal with. Neither of these people are people that I would hold as
role models for my grandchildren. But, this election must be about
more than personalities. It is essential that anyone who possibly
can, think long and hard before voting. What do you want the future
to be for your children and grandchildren? Do you want a vibrant
nation, a growing booming economy, a nation respected around the
world? Or, do you want more of the same; nearly 50 percent of all
American adults are not working, continued violence in our cities,
more terrorist attacks, continuing invasion of illegal migrants
across our borders, continuing attacks on our Christian, American
culture?
You need to think
about it. The ruling class, the elites, Mrs. Clinton, and the whole
Washington establishment must be brought down and it has to begin
tomorrow with this election.
Vote, but vote
America and her future.
Saturday, October 29, 2016
The Empire Will Be For Sale
This
Presidential election has generated more anger and angst and, yes,
violence than any other in my lifetime. I find it amazing that the
Progressives, the radicals, the “wanna be in the cool kids club”
and others have become so unhinged, so deranged at the Trump
candidacy.
I am not a Trumpeter and never have been. He was not my first, nor second, nor third choice in the very wide, deep and highly qualified Republican field. I spent my formative years in New Jersey and Mr. Trump reminds me of a lot of the kids I was in high school with. I didn’t like a lot of those guys then and I really don’t care for Mr. Trump now. But, there may be very good reasons to support and to vote for Mr. Trump.
One
can look at the situation in the United States and in the world and
get the unpleasant feeling that things are not going well for
America. The world is aflame with radical Islamic violence. Our
nation is aflame with attacks on police officers and rioting every
time a cop uses a gun. There are 94 million Americans without work.
And, our government is allowing unrestricted entry into our country.
The economy is not growing and the government is borrowing ever more
money that someday will have to be paid back. Many Americans may
feel that things are spinning out of control and that someone must
take hold of the reins before it is way too late.
Let us consider the candidates position on immigration. Mrs. Clinton claims to be in favor of border security, but her party (and the Washington Republicans) have proven that they will not enforce the border. Mrs. Clinton favors amnesty for illegals; full citizenship, rights and benefits for people who broke our laws to get here. Mr. Trump claims to favor building a border wall, enforcing existing laws and removing criminal immigrants.
There may be several really good reasons for supporting Trump’s position on immigration. Consider that there are already 94 million Americans without jobs. It does not make sense to bring more people into a country with no jobs. Common sense, here, please. One can favor immigration control without being a “racist”. In fact, calling Trump Deplorables “racist” keeps Progressives from having to engage in meaningful dialog, defending their indefensible position.
Consider, for a moment, the candidates positions on taxes. Mrs Clinton wants “the 1 percent” and corporations to pay more taxes. Half of Americans already pay no income tax at all. The top 1 percent of earners pay over 35% of all income taxes. When is enough enough? The average corporate income tax (federal and state) is 39% in the US. Ireland, on the other hand, taxes corporations at 15%. There are economic laws that are as immutable as the law of gravity: and one of these is that money goes where taxes are lower.
Mr. Trump wants to cut income taxes, corporate taxes and the estate tax. The Progressives, the radicals, the “wanna be in the cool kids club” wail about cutting taxes on the rich. Hey! Poor folks don’t pay income tax! History is clear on this, whenever a government cuts taxes, revenue to the government increases. Queen Victoria cut taxes in the British Empire and her reign became the Golden Age of Empire. President Warren Harding cut income taxes in the 1920s and the result was the great economic expansion known as the “Roaring 20s”. John Kennedy cut income taxes in the 1960s and the resulting revenue flood allowed LBJ to fund both the Viet Nam war and the Great Society socialist programs. President Reagan cut taxes and the county enjoyed a 20 year economic boom.
Those who forget history are damned to repeat it. Facts is facts, and cutting taxes spurs economic growth.
If one considers American foreign policy under the Obama presidency, one might seriously think that there is a need for change. After 8 years of Progressive control, American foreign policy is in shambles. Russia and China are tweaking the US with impunity. The world is aflame with Moslem violence, one group of murderous Moslem thugs have even gone so far as to have established a “caliphate” in territory they captured from US and its allies in Syria and Iraq. Mrs. Clinton was one of the architects of the Obama foreign policy. Mr. Obama himself has said that he does not want to talk about “defeating” an enemy as that just leads to further conflict. Current Secretary of State, John Kerry claims that man made “climate change” is a greater threat than Moslem violence. Lunacy is rampant in this administration and Mrs. Clinton is part of it all and would simply continue the lunacy..
Should
Mrs. Clinton become President, there is no reason to think that she
would change the current course at all. Many Americans believe that
Mr. Trump would, at a minimum, put American interests ahead of those
of other nations and peoples. That would be a major foreign policy
change. Foreign leaders know that they can bully, or buy, Mrs.
Clinton. That would be a bad thing.
Voters can consider personalities, but I think that is rather childish. Mr. Trump is a potty mouth, blow hard, braggart who can be annoying, but we are voting for President not for Preacher. Mrs. Clinton is no saint, either. If one reads the things that her security people have written over the years, Mrs. Clinton has a mouth just a bad as Trump’s. One can question Donald Trump’s business ethics, but there is no shortage of ethical questions surrounding Hillary Clinton. Voters need to focus on issues in this election.
Lastly,
I think voters need to consider the questions surrounding Mrs.
Clinton and her fund raising. It truly appears that Mrs. Clinton
favored nations and individuals who contributed to their so-called
charity. If I may interject a personal thought here, I truly believe
that every decision Mrs. Clinton would make would favor who ever paid
her the most. Should she be elected, I truly believe that we will
see the end of the Republic.
With Mrs. Clinton in the Oval Office,
the Empire will truly be for sale.
Thursday, April 7, 2016
Of Roasting Peanuts and Coal Smoke
Memories are
interesting things; especially those we can recall, which seem to
become fewer and fewer for me as time goes by. Memories are those
visions that remind us of where we came from to get where we are now,
whenever and where ever now may be. They can be set in concrete or
as ephemeral as a will o' the wisp, or as ground mist dissipating
after a summer rain shower. I have trouble remembering what I did
day before yesterday, but I can remember seeing the rainbow over the
hen house almost 60 years ago.
As we made our plans
to move back to New Bethlehem, I started wondering what things I
would remember from my previous 10 years residence here. I wondered
if I would remember people, or buildings, or roads, or the shape of
the land. I have never moved back – so this was (and is) a new
experience for me. As it happened, I did remember some people, some
buildings, some roads and the shape of some of the land, but much of
what I have been seeing seems completely new, as if I were, once
again, a stranger in strange land.
I am not
complaining. It is refreshing, and maybe a bit exhilarating to be in
a new experience at my age. As we get older, we sometimes find
ourselves becoming a bit jaded – we think that we have seen and
done it all and we sometimes think that we don't have the heart or
the strength for new experiences, even if we could find them. I
think that is one of the ways that we impose “aging” on
ourselves: we lose the will to experience new things. While one
cannot escape physical aging, I am convinced that we can keep our
minds and hearts young and vibrant simply by choosing not to get
mentally and spiritually old. These are some of the “mind forged
manacles” (to quote my favorite radio guy) with which we shackle
ourselves.
![]() |
| Early March morning snow in New Bethlehem |
New Bethlehem,
Pennsylvania is home to one of J. M. Smuckers' peanut processing
facilities. When the folks over at Smuckers are roasting peanuts,
the mouth watering aroma fills the Red Bank valley. It is almost
impossible not to rush home and fix a PB&J sandwich when you
smell it. It is a rich, earthy smell that reminds me of my mother's
kitchen in that old farmhouse in the hills of Virginia.
The smell of coal
smoke is a different critter all together. This area was once, long
before the EPA and progressive idiocy, one of the great coal
producing regions of the country. There are massive beds of soft
coal here, no longer allowed to be mined. But, the smell of coal
smoke reminds me of that era of commerce; when the hills and hollows
reverberated with the roar of big machinery and train whistles echoed
down the valley. It is a strong smell; dark and oily, the smell of
machinery and shops and manufacturing and work. It is a smell of a
younger, more vibrant America, building a nation and building a
world.
It is the smell of
time now gone and the world is poorer for that loss.
I stood in the alley
that morning, drinking in this combination of smells that is
completely unique to New Bethlehem, My memory was swept with images
of our children, our dogs, our earlier life here. And they were good
memories, and I found myself excited about being here again, about
starting a new life here, even with the remnants of the roots of that
previous life.
We can, if we
choose, continue to be excited by life, even as we age. The choice
is ours. I realized that again as I smelled roasting peanuts and
coal smoke in the early morning snow.
Wednesday, January 13, 2016
The Dumbest Dog I Have Ever Owned Taught Me a Lesson
Scotty
is our 8 year old Maltese dog. Scotty is a good dog, he's extremely
loving and loveable, but he is without a doubt the dumbest dog I have
ever owned. He seems to be completely un trainable, except for being
housebroken. He doesn't know or do any tricks except to dance around
on his hind legs when he wants attention. He's not much of a
watchdog, relying on Blue, the Dachshund, to tell him when it is time
to bark. And, he's spoiled, insisting on being lifted onto the bed
instead of jumping on the trunk at the foot of the bed and then up
onto the bed. But for all of his intelligence shortcomings, Scotty
showed me something profound the other day.
I
have my alarm set for 5:30 AM. That gives me a little time to drink
coffee, read the headlines on the Internet and get to the gym before
someone else takes the Octane bicycle. Scotty and Blue tend to
pretend that they don't hear the alarm and stay in bed until it is
obvious that I am not coming back. I usually miss them waking up.
Sunday
mornings I don't tend to get up that early. I can “sleep in”
until 7:30 and still make it to Sunday School or Church depending on
which way I turn when leaving the driveway. This past Sunday, I was
awake and just laying in bed enjoying the warmth and knowing it was
cold as winter out side. (Seeing as how it is winter!) As a result,
I was there to watch Scotty wake up.
Scotty
started his morning by lifting his head and rolling up to onto his
tummy. He looked around the room, studying his “den” to make
sure all was well. Or, trying to remember where he was, as I have
said, he is not the brightest canine in the world.
Suddenly,
he jumped to his feet and began to wag his tail and wiggle his whole
little doggie body in paroxysms of pure joy. He came over and began
licking my face and tapping at me with his front paws. The dog was
just absolutely overcome with the joy of just being.
The
joy of just being.
The
joy of just being! What a wonderful way to start the day! How can I
learn to wake up like the dog and sing in my heart, “This is the
day the Lord has made, Let us rejoice and be glad in it!” Can I
learn to wake up each morning with just joy and love and happiness in
my heart? How can the dog feel such joy while I have to look for it?
The
dog is not burdened with human thoughts and human wants. He is
creature of nature, simply one of God's creatures in God's world.
The dog does not worry about what kind of a house he lives in as long
as his “pack” is there together. Scotty doesn't care what kind
of car he rides in as long as he is riding with his people. He
doesn't care what kind of clothes his people wear as long as we are
here for him to love and to love him back.
And
to feed him twice a day. He is pretty insistent on that.
I
saw it there Sunday morning. That dumb, simple dog waking up just
joyous and happy and in love with life itself. That is how I should
start each day. I should start the day with joy and thanksgiving and
let the aches and pains and worries take a far distant second place
to the joy of being alive. I have to take a lesson from Scotty the
dog, life is good, and we should celebrate each day as a gift from
God, endless with possibilities. So easy, so simple; just greet each
day with joy, love of life and a spirit of thanksgiving.
Thank
you, Scotty. Maybe you are smarter than I think you are.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
